MINERAL ADSORBENTS IN BROILERS NUTRITION – EFFECTS ON YIELD AND MEAT QUALITY

In this paper are presented the results of investigation of the application of mineral adsorbents in broiler diet. Total of 400 broilers Cobb 500 provenience were divided into 4 groups: control group (C) of broilers fed without added mineral adsorbent; 1 st group with added Min-a-zel in the amount of 0.5%; 2 nd group with added Min-a-zel Plus in the amount of 0.2%; and 3 rd group with added Min-a-zel Plus in the amount of 0.3%. Fattening lasted for 42 days. Broilers were reared on the floor stocking system; feed and water supply were ad libitum. Fattening performances such as live body weight, feed consumption, feed conversion ratio and production number were better in group of broilers that was fed a diet with added mineral adsorbents. Broilers from the 1 st group achieved the highest live weight and had the lowest feed consumption and feed conversion ratio, and also the best production number. Slaughter characteristics of broilers in the 1 st group were also the best. They had the biggest share of the most valuable parts, breast and drumsticks. Obtained results showed that mineral adsorbents can be successfully used as additives in the diets for broilers for improved production and better fattening performances.


INTRODUCTION
Solution for larger production of food for humans and feed for animals is using of new technologies in biotechnology.Basic orientation are new technological procedures that have aim to improve nutritive value of food and feed, as well as valorization of by-products of food production and primary agricultural production (Tica et al., 2009;2010).Performances of broilers in fattening, their slaughter characteristics and meat quality are linked to pre-mortal and post-mortal factors (Ristić et al., 2005).It is considered that diet, as a pre-mortal factor, dominantly impacts with more than 30% the quality of carcasses and meat (Barbut et al., 2005;Andersen et al., 2005;Blagojević et al., 2009).Main aim in broiler fattening is to obtain the highest live weight in the shortest period of time with high proportion of muscles (especially the most valuable: breast and leg), minimum proportion of bones in the carcass, as well as good productive performances such as low feed conversion ratio.These results depend on breed, sex and nutrition.When studying the growing chickens, it is often necessary to determine the whole body composition (Andrássy- Baka et al., 2003) and body mass index (Mendes et al., 2007).Also, the quality of the carcass can be assessed on the basis of a number of criteria for evaluation of sensory, morphological, histological, physical, chemical, health, hygienic and technological properties and features (Straková et al., 2006).Many investigations contributed to breed, sex and diet impact on the carcass composition and tissue weight distribution of broiler chickens (Bašić et al., 2009;Cmiljanić et al., 2005;Shahin and Elazeem, 2005).
Presence of mycotoxins in feed mixtures is worldwide problem.Their alimentary ingestion can cause intoxication of many animals in one herd (Elaroussi et al., 2008;Stevanović et al., 2011).Besides this, residues of mycotoxins in animal products could cause intoxication in humans (Lilić et al., 2010;Karović et al., 2013).
Zeolite minerals in inorganic form absorb polar mycotoxins as aflatoxin and ergot alkaloids, but do not absorb vitamins, microelements and amino acids.Becides the absorption of mycotoxins, zeolite absorbs bacterial toxins and gases.It is nonresorbtive and do not leave residues in meat and eggs.Due to these properties, it improves feed conversion ratio and performances in the fattening (Miazzo et al., 2005).Bočarov-Stančić et al., 2001) reported better weight gain of broilers (1.7-2.6%)fed the feed mixtures with added zeolites as well as better feed consumption (5.9-6.4%)than the broilers fed the feed mixtures without zeolites.Zeolite (clinoptilolite) in amount of 1.2% and 4% had positive influence on weight gain and live weight of broilers.Feed conversion ratio was better when 2% of zeolite has been added.

Dobeic et al. (1994) (cited by
Adding of "Min-a-zel" in amount of 0.5% in feed mixtures had positive influence on live weight and weight gain of broilers and made impossible the deposing of aflatoxin B1 in organs (Resanović et al., 2009).Karović et al., 2013) stated that clinoptilolite presence in animal fodder would lead to a significant increase of feed efficiency as well as reduction of potential for intestinal diseases (diarrhoea), whereby the toxic effect of ammonium ions surplus would be redu-ced.Some researchers explain this with the existence of the clinoptilolite preference for large ions such as NH 4 + , so it serves as a reservoir for ammonia.Also, using of zeolites in diets has positive impact on lowering of mortality, good health and better quality of eggs and meat (Bogosavljević-Bošković et al., 2009; Okanović et al., 2013).

Boyer (2000) (cited by
The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of adding mineral adsorbentsnatural zeolite under the commercial names "Min-a-zel" and "Min-a-zel-Plus" in the feed mixtures, on fattening performances and slaughter characteristics of broilers.

MATERIAL AND METHODS
In this study, a total of 400 broilers Cobb 500 provenience were used.Broilers were divided into four groups: control (C), 1 st experimental, 2 nd experimental and 3 rd experimental group.For each group were used feed mixtures that meet normative (Serbian Regulations, 2010) for this proveniencestarter (1-14 th day), grower (15-34 th day) and finisher (35-42 nd day).Raw materials and proximate composition of feed mixtures are presented in Table 1.
Proximate composition (moisture content, crude protein content, crude fibre, crude fat content and ash content) of complete feed mixtures used for broiler diets was determinated according to AOAC methods (1995).
Broilers in the control group were fed diet without added zeolite, while broilers in experimental groups were fed diets with added zeolite: 1 st group contained 0.5% of "Min-a-Zel", 2 nd group contained 0.2% of "Min-a-Zel Plus" and 3 rd group contained 0.3% of "Min-a-Zel Plus".
All the diets were provided ad libitum and conventional breeding and rearing practices were followed.
"Min-a-Zel" is the product obtained from natural zeolite (clinoptilites) with good balance of calcium, sodium and potassium."Min-a-Zel Plus" is obtained by modification of zeolites using organic cations (Adamović et al., 2003).The structure of natural zeolites is such that they are good adsorbents of small organic molecules.The modification of zeolite was done with the cation exchange on the surfaceinorganic cations were replaced with organic cations.This changes the surface electricity and hydrophobic properties.Adsorption efficiency of this modified mineral adsorbent "Min-a-zel Plus" is more than 90% for aflatoxins, zearalenon, ochratoxin A and group of ergot alkaloids (Tomašević-Čanović et al., 2003).
Both "Min-a-Zel" and "Min-a-Zel Plus" were manufactured by the Institute for technology of nuclear and other mineral raw materials, Belgrade, Serbia.
Fattening performance was measured by the following parameters: live weight, feed consumption and feed conversion ratio, as well as production index using the formula (Radović et al., 2003):

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Results of mortality and fattening performances of broilers are presented in Table 2.
The highest mortality of 7% was in the control group (C), 3% was in the 1 st and 2 nd group and the least 2% in the 3 rd group.
The highest feed consumption (3677 g) had broilers from the control group.In other groups, broilers had similar feed consumption, in the 1 st group 3660 g, in the 2 nd 3670 g and in the 3 rd group 3665 g per broiler.
Average live weight of broilers at the end of the fattening period was significantly different (P < 0.01).The highest average live weight of 2136 g had broilers fed diet with added "Min-a-zel" 0.5% (1 st group).Lower average live weight was recorded in the 3 rd group of broilers (1941 g), the 2 nd group (1853 g) and C group (1697 g).One of the main parameters that show quality of broiler production is the production index, which is linked to live weight, feed consumption and feed conversion ratio.According to obtained results, production index was the highest in the 1 st group (287.1),lower in the 3 rd (239.1) and 2 nd group (216.6) and the least in C group (174.4).
It can be concluded that broilers from the 1 st and 3 rd group, that had Min-a-zel 0.5% and Min-a-zel Plus 0.3% in diets had better results than broilers that had no zeolite in diet and that had Min-a-zel Plus in the amount of 0.2% in the diet.
In the accordance with literature data about fattening performances of broilers, ascertainment is that broilers from 1 st group achieved very good results for this provenience (Blagojević et al., 2009).It should be noted that broilers fed a diet with added modified clinoptilites had better performances than broilers from control group (Nešić et al., 2004) and according to that statistically significant differences (P < 0.01) between average values were observed.
Results on carcass weight and slaughtering characteristics are shown in Tables 3, 4 and 5.
From Table 3, it can been seen that broilers of the control group (C) had the least carcass weight (1220 g).Carcass yield was similar in all groups without significant differences (P > 0.01).Broilers from the 1 st and 3 rd group with added "Min-a-zel" 0.5% and "Min-a-zel Plus" 0.3% had carcass yield 72.10% and 72.20%, respectively, while broilers from the other two groups had 71.87% (C) and 71.93% (2 nd group).
The results yield and share of main parts of broiler carcasses are presented in Tables 4 and 5. Masses of breast and drumstick shown the highest level of statistical differences.The highest breast weight had broilers from the 1 st group (472.4 g) which was significantly higher (P < 0.01) than 391.4 g that was recorded in the control group, 439.6 g measured in the 2 nd group and 440.9 g in the 3 rd group.While the weight of breast from broilers in the 2 nd and 3 rd group were similar (P > 0.05), they were significantly higher (P < 0.01) than the breast weight in the control group.Breast share in carcasses was in the range of 30.6-32.9% in all groups.
Similar results were obtained for drumstick weight."Min-a-zel" and "Min-a-zel Plus" added in larger amounts showed positive effect on yield of these parts.The highest weight of drumsticks was recorded in broilers of the 1 st group (452.8 g) which was no significantly different (P > 0.05) than drumstick weight of broilers in the 3 rd group (433.9 g), but both values were significantly higher (P < 0.01) than drumsticks weight of broilers in the control group (379.3 g).Drumsticks weight of 414.6 g in broilers of the 2 nd group was significantly lower (P < 0.05) than the drumsticks weight in broilers of the 1 st group (P < 0.05).Share of drumsticks was similar to breast share and was in the range of 29.4% in the 1 st group to 31.1% in the 2 nd group.
Back weight was similar in the 2 nd and 3 rd experimental groups (285.3 g and 307.8 g, respectively).Share was similar too, 21.3% and 21.9%, respectively.The back weight of 261.3 g was recorded in the control group of broilers (21.4%), and was significantly different (P < 0.01) from 396.6 g (25.7%) in broilers of the 1 st group.
Weights of wings were very different.They were similar in the 1 st and 3 rd group, 141.4 g (9.2%) and 141.0 g (10.0%), respectively.Lower values were recorded in the control group, 122.5 g (10.0%) and in the 2 nd group, 129.9 g (9.7%) respectively, which was significantly different (P < 0.01) from the values in the 1 st and 3 rd group.
Neck weight in the control group was 42.2 g, in the 1 st group 56.7 g, in the 2 nd group 47.2 g and in the 3 rd group 50.5 g.Share of neck was very similar in all groups and was in the range of 3.4-3.7%.The highest weight of abdominal fat of 9.5 g had broilers in the control group, which was significantly higher than the values in the other groups, i.e. 6.6 g, 5.6 g and 6.1 g in the 1 st , 2 nd and 3 rd group, respectively.
Share of abdominal fat was 0.4% in the 1 st , 2 nd and 3 rd group and 0.8% in the control group.
Obtained results showed that mineral adsorbents can be successfully used as additive in the diet for broilers for improved production, better fattening performances and meat safety and quality (Barbut et al., 2005).Although it was not the object of this investigation, it is interesting to mention that fattening of broilers with added mineral adsorbents in the feed mixtures was economically justified (Tica et al., 2010).

CONCLUSION
On the basis of obtained results, the following can be concluded: -Feed consumption was the highest in broilers of the control group.The lowest average feed consumption had broilers in the 1 st group that was fed diet with added "Min-a-zel" in the amount of 0.5%; -Feed conversion ratio was the best in the 1 st group and the highest in the control group; -Broilers fed diet with added "Min-a-zel" in amount of 0.5% and "Min-a-zel Plus" in the amount of 0.3% achieved higher final body weights, which were significantly different from other two groups; -Production number was the highest in the 1 st group and the lowest in the control group; -Broilers fed diet with added "Min-a-zel" in the amount of 0.5% and "Min-a-zel Plus" in the amount of 0.3% had higher weight of breast and drumsticks that was significantly different from other two groups; -Broilers fed diet with added "Min-a-zel" (0.5%) and "Min-a-zel Plus" (0.3%) had significantly higher (P < 0.01) weights of breast and drumsticks than the broilers fed diet without mineral adsorbents.

Table 1 .
Raw materials and proximate composition of feed mixtures

Table 2 .
Mortality and fattening performances

Table 3 .
Live weight of broilers, carcass wight and carcass yield (n=32) x, y, q, z Means within the same column with different superscript letters are different (P ≤ 0.01)

Table 4 .
Yield and share of breast, drumstick and back (n=32) x, y, q, z Means within the same column with different superscript letters are different (P ≤ 0.01) a, b, c, d Means within the same column with different superscript letters are different (P ≤ 0.05)