How Millennials and Generation Z organise travel during the COVID-19 pandemic

The subject of the paper is the consumer behaviour of Millennials and Generation Z as travellers in organising their travel. Through empirical research, conducted with online questionnaire in May 2021, the paper focuses on the way the above-mentioned generations in Serbia have organized travel (through a travel agency or on their own) before and during the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as the choice of accommodation during the pandemic, and the respondents‟ opinions on travel with COVID-19 passports. The aim of this paper is to discover the preferences and opinions of travellers when organizing travel under the new circumstances, as well as examining whether there are differences in the behaviour of Millennials and Generation Z as travellers before and during the pandemic, in order to provide significant information for the marketing decision making of tourism and hospitality organisations. Almost a quarter of the world's population is made up of Millennials, who, along with Generation Z, make up the current and future force that contributes the most to the income generation. Members of this population in Serbia are less and less opting for the services of travel agencies, especially during the pandemic, while the number of passengers of these generations who organize self-directed travel is on the increase. Quantitative statistical methods – descriptive statistics (frequency distribution) and comparative statistics (Pearson χ2-test) were used for analysis of the obtained research results.


Introduction
Several significant crisesepidemics, the World Economic Crisis, political crises, natural disasters have had a negative effect on the world tourism economy at the beginning of the 21st century. The most adverse effects until 2020 were caused by the World Economic Crisis, when indicators of tourism development were unfavorable worldwide. However, regardless of the type and duration of a crisis, tourism has shown an exceptional ability to recover (Milićević & Ervaćanin, 2016) until the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic, the effects of which have not yet been fully seen as the crisis continues.
Organisations strive to understand and determine the reasons for certain consumer behaviour as it affects the success of business. During the COVID-19 pandemic, there have emerged numerous changes in consumer behaviour. In order to ensure survival on the market in unstable and uncertain business conditions, it is necessary to conduct marketing research in a timely manner, among other business actions. The results of the research form a base for formulating an appropriate (marketing) strategy. Also, it is important for (marketing) managers in tourism to understand the behaviour of tourists in order to formulate marketing and destination management strategies that are based on accurate knowledge of tourist behaviour and future trends (Senić & Milojević, 2017).
The subject of the paper is the consumer behaviour of Millennials (also called Generation Y) and Generation Z as travellers in organising their travel. Through empirical research, we have analyzed the way the Millennials and Gen Zedders in Serbia have organised their travel (on their own or through a travel agency), before and during the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as their choice of accommodation during the pandemic, and the respondents' opinions on travel with COVID-19 passports. The aim of this paper is to discover the travellers" preferences and opinions when organising travel under the new circumstances, as well as to examine whether there are differences in the behaviour of Generation Z and Millennials as travellers before and during the pandemic, in order to provide important information for the process of making adequate marketing decisions of tourism and hospitality organisations. The desktop and field research in the paper contributes to understanding the travel behaviour of Millennials and Generation Z, both in Serbia and worldwide, during the COVID-19 pandemic. The specificity of the work is reflected in the empirical research that refers to the respondents as members of Generation Y and Generation Z in Serbia, which contributes to understanding the way they organise their travel during the COVID-19 pandemic.
"The Millennials" generation is, in size, larger than any other adult cohort" (MSCI, 2020). In 2020, this generation made up 23% of the world's population (United Nations, 2019). Millennials will represent 50% of international travellers by 2025, and they "are already recognized by the tourism sector as a current and future driving force of revenues", (Hospitality net, 2015). Because of certain similarities, Millennials are often associated with Generation Z (ILTM, 2020), assuming that Gen Z have limited financial power because they are younger and mostly in the process of education. Millennials (born from 1980 to 1995) and Generation Z (born from 1995 to 2010) know best how to use the internet to plan and organise their travel.

Trends in travel of younger generations
It is a great challenge to offer products/services that are customized to consumers. Organisations need to be aware of important trends prevailing among the target group in order to keep up with the changes and formulate adequate marketing strategies. It is also important for tourism organisations to know the characteristics of their target group, as well as the latest trends of tourism consumers. The personality of travellers and the choice of destinations were the subject of research in the early seventies of the twentieth century (Plog, 1974), as well as the nature of tourism planning (Getz, 1986), which resulted in the formulation of models for application in tourism.
Some of the trends which emerged before the pandemic are the following ones: consumers are more aware of their needs and travellers are becoming more informed, more empowered and able to organise their travel independently; sustainable holidays; looking for a personal growth (meditation), usage of new technologies (Ortiz, 2019). Travellers increasingly value authenticity, destinations away from major tourist areas and options that reduce the negative impact on the environment. The most demanding tourists prefer to choose local places, looking for less crowded destinations or opt for large cities from which they visit smaller local places. The trend is tourism which focuses on rural locations where nature is dominant. There are tourism consumers who opt for tourism products that include activities to seek disconnection and relax, like meditation and yoga. Some consumers grouped around the "Joy of Missing Out" (JOMO) like to be disconnected from their smartphones to enjoy their free time, and more travellers are looking for JOMO experiences (Euromonitor International, 2019). And when it comes to the use of technology, the usage of the Internet to search for tourist destinations and reserve accommodation is becoming more commonplace. Serbian consumers frequently use internet to book their travels, more when staying abroad than for domestic stays, and the most popular booking platform in Serbia are Booking.com and Airbnb (Kalinić & Novaković, 2019).
According to a survey conducted by Booking.com (Donovan, 2021) on a sample of 20,934 respondents in 28 countries, during July 2020, travellers around the world (53%) had a greater desire to explore the world in a more sustainable way. Travellers from Colombia (74%), Brazil (71%) and India (70%) expressed a particularly strong desire to become more environmentally oriented. More than half of travellers (63%) intended to stay away from crowded tourist attractions; 51% of respondents will avoid travel during the season; and 48% of respondents will visit alternative destinations to prevent overcrowding. According to the next survey of the same company (Booking.com) on a sample of 29,349 respondents in 30 countries, during March 2021, 68% of travellers wanted the money they spent on travel to go to the local community; and 84% of passengers planned to reduce the waste and recycle plastic products when visiting a particular destination, and this percentage was growing among travellers from Thailand (94%), Croatia (91%) and Argentina (90%). Temporary suspension of travel had inspired 83% of travellers to make sustainable travel their priority in the future, while 70% of respondents were more likely to choose accommodation that applies sustainable practices. These data, in addition to revealing the motivations of passengers after the pandemic, also emphasize the importance of taking further steps to improve the sustainability of tourism and hospitality facilities.
Millennials are "the first generation that experience the technological boom", and "they are the most readily involved in the world of social media influence" (ETC, 2016). According to ETC (2016), the following characteristics also apply to Millennials. Generation Y like to show off their trip online and they also like to stay in the most luxurious destinations they can afford. "Millennials love to travel, but not just for leisure. They prioritize adventure, learning about the world and discovering new places". Millennials and Gen Z know better than other (older) generations how to use the internet to plan and organise their travel. CBI -Ministry of Foreign Affairs (2021) has stated the following characteristics of Millennials. They value green business practices, and "do not look for quality only, but for premium personalised service for a reasonable price". Generation Y explore on the go to find the best travel options for themselves, and travel more often with friends, colleagues and relatives than other generations. It is characteristic of the millennial market that the share of female travellers is above average.
According to the Deloitte Global Millennial Survey (Deloitte, 2019, p. 5), 57% of Millennials and Generation Z reported that "travel the world was their number one ambition, even overtaking high earning, owning a home and having children". Compared to previous generations, the life stage without family commitments has been shifted to older ages and this has resulted in consequences related to other dimensions of life: the pattern of savings, consumption and travel (MSCI, 2020). The Millennial generation is more likely than other age brackets (Gen X and Boomers) to consider returning to travel again after lifting the lockdowns and they are less risk-averse (ILTM, 2020).

The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on Millennials and Generation Z travellers
The COVID-19 pandemic and its resulting recession will have a long-lasting impact on younger generations -Generation Y and Generation Z. Their consumer behaviour is largely shaped by the following factors: increasing stress, home-oriented lives and rising unemployment. According to Environics Institute research (Environics Institute, 2021), a majority of Canada"s younger generations (aged 18-40) say that the COVID-19 pandemic has had at least a moderate impact on their lives, and most expect their lives to return to normal after the pandemic in a period of seven months to two years. Organisations need to adapt their (marketing) strategies in order to stay relevant to Millennials and Generation Z during the pandemic and beyond (Euromonitor International, 2020).
According to a study by Advantage (2020), 44% of Millennial travellers (25-34 years old; from UK) "who do not currently book through a travel agent would use one in future, indicating advice, expertise and the reassurance of having someone to help if travel plans need to change, as the ma in reasons for now favoring a human travel agent over booking online". The 18-24 age group (76%) has demonstrated that the younger audience is open to booking with their local travel agent. The results also found that, the younger the age group, the more willing they are to pay for a COVID test to travel. 79% of 18-24 age group have confirmed they would pay for a test to travel, whilst 56% of respondents over 65 years old would not be prepared to do so.
During the crisis, there is an above average level of hope relative to the state of travel (DCI, 2020). Across all generations (Generation Z, Generation Y -Millennials, Generation X and Boomers) in the USA and Canada, "people are neither hopeless nor extremely hopeful, but somewhere in the middle" (DCI, 2020). Millennials have said that they will travel during the pandemic, engaging in riskier behaviour than older generations. Generation X and Boomers have stated that they are less afraid of COVID-19 than Millennials and Generation Z. It is common for all generations in terms of future travel that they are the least afraid to travel to domestic locations, but going abroad creates the greatest concern. The youngest generation (Gen Z) are engaging in riskier travel than the older generations, but the results also indicate that Gen Z has planned the least travel in 2020.
According to the same survey (DCI, 2020), the greatest percentage of Generation Z are afraid of getting sick during/after travel (20%), then, Gen Z are afraid of being quarantined when they return home (16%), of flights cancelling (12%), of being stuck in the destination (12%), of getting denied access to a region/crossing borders (12%), attractions/restaurants being closed (8%), transmitting the virus (8%). Millennials are afraid of getting sick during/after travel (17%), transmitting the virus (16%), being stuck in the destination (15%), being quarantined when they return home (13%), flights cancelling (13%), of getting denied access to a region/crossing borders (9%). The youngest generation (Generation Z) said they would be willing to pay more money to travel somewhere without coronavirus threats (58%), and one quarter of Millennials (25%) would be willing to pay more for coronavirus-free destinations.
"The challenge for the tourism industry would be to bring back tourists" travel confidence by introducing measures that ensure their safety against the present health crisis" (Seabra et al., 2021, p. 479). During the pandemic, tourists have asked questions about the hygiene conditions of the travel destinations, and they are looking for clarity regarding emergency services from tourism industry that are beyond the services and hospitality they are offering. Therefore, the managers of tourism organizations may be required to work with the government at the local and national levels to solve problems affecting the tourism industry due to new requirements regarding COVID-19 (Seabra et al., 2021).
Before COVID-19, Millennials travelled more than any other generation per year (an average is 35 days per year), and 83% of Millennials worldwide chose to vacation at all-inclusive resorts where they had everything they needed (Rezdy, 2018). "Many Millennials are already engaging with luxury travel in ways unexpected of them", and they are very important in helping the luxury travel industry recover (ILTM, 2020).
According to Rezdy (2018), more than 72% of Millennial travellers said that a solid advertising promotion could convince them to book travel arrangements, therefore, "online advertising, including retargeting and other social strategies, is the best way to connect and engage with Millennials". Amid the pandemic, consumer habits have changed and an effective presence on social media has become very important. Tourism and hospitality organisations should engage with influencers on social media and operate across multichannel platforms to ensure a stronger position for recovery. During the COVID-19 pandemic, YouTube and Twitter have topped the list of widely-used platforms for travel promotions, but TikTok also holds marketing potential (GlobalData, 2020).
Based on the review of previous literature on the topic (Advantage, 2020; DCI, 2020; ILTM, 2020; Rezdy, 2018; Seabra et al., 2021) and the authors' assumptions, the following research hypotheses were defined: Research hypothesis H1: There is a statistically significant difference in the respondents" answers (according to gender, generations, the amount of income) in relation to the question regarding the organisation of travel (under their own direction, through a travel agency) before the outbreak of the pandemic.
Research hypothesis H2: There is a statistically significant difference in the respondents" answers (according to gender, generations, the amount of income) in relation to the question regarding the organisation of travel (on their own, through a travel agency) during the pandemic.
Research hypothesis H3: There is a statistically significant difference in the respondents" answers (according to gender, generations, the amount of income) in relation to the choice of accommodation facilities during the pandemic (private accommodation for personal hygiene care, checked hotels, any accommodation).
Research hypothesis H4: There is a statistically significant difference in the respondents" answers (according to gender, generations, the amount of income) in relation to the question regarding the opinion about travel with the COVID-19 passport.
Research hypothesis H5: There is a statistically significant difference in the answers of Millennials and Generation Z as travellers before and during the pandemic.

Methodology of the empirical research
The quantitative, survey research was conducted by questionnaire in written form. The online survey was prepared specially for the needs of this research and was distributed to respondents aged 20 to 40 (to members of Generation Y -Millennials and Generation Z), in the period from 9th May to 21st May, 2021. Respondents from all regions of Serbia were included. The intentions of consumers as travellers regarding their travel organisation during the pandemic were examined.
The sample is stratified and consists of 300 respondents: 150 respondents of Generation Z (aged 20 to 26) and 150 respondents of Generation Y (aged 27 to 40). Older members of Generation Z, who can make travel decisions and travel independently, were taken into account. The structure of the sample according to gender is as follows: 50% of male respondents, 50% female; according to the employment status: student (36%), employed (51%) and unemployed (13%); and according to the amount of monthly income during the pandemic (taking into account those who earn an income): 20% of respondents with below average income, 69% of respondents with average income and 11% of respondents with above average income. The statistical error of the sample is 5.6%. Due to the insufficient number of respondents for reliable representativeness, this research represents a case study.
The SPSS was used for data processing and analysis, as well as for the interpretation of the obtained research results. From the quantitative statistical methods, the following were used: descriptive statistics (frequency distribution) and comparative statistics (Pearson χ2-test).

Results of the empirical research
Nearly half of Generation Y and Generation Z respondents (47%) would choose countries that abide by all epidemiological measures and where they would feel safe. Most respondents (45%) do not care where they would stay in the future, while 22% would choose only verified hotels in terms of implementing epidemiological measures, 11% would opt for private accommodation where they would themselves be in charge of hygiene, and 22% are undecided on this issue. According to χ2-test (Value = 94.404 a , df = 3, p = 0.00 < 0.05), it was found that there is a statistically significant difference in the responses of respondents according to gender in relation to the question regarding the choice of accommodation facilities in the future (Table 1). There is a higher percentage of female respondents whose choice would be private accommodation where they would themselves be in charge of hygiene (19%) compared to male respondents (2%), and there is a higher percentage of male respondents who would choose verified hotels (38%) compared to female respondents (7%), (Table 4). According to χ2-test (Value = 24.069 a , df = 3, p = 0.00 < 0.05), it was found that there is a statistically significant difference in the responses of the respondents according to generations in relation to the choice of accommodation facilities in the future ( Table 2). The percentage of Millennials whose choice would be private accommodation for hygiene reasons (15%) and verified hotels (27%) is higher compared to the Generation Z (private accommodation: 6%, hotels: 18%), a higher percentage of whom point out that they do not care where they would stay (59%) compared to Millennials (31%), (Table 5). According to Table 3, there is a statistically significant difference in the responses of respondents according to the amount of income in relation to the choice of facilities for accommodation (χ2-test, Value = 35.239 a , df = 6, p = 0.00 < 0.05). The largest percentage of respondents with incomes at the average (45%) and above the average (54%) said that they do not care where they would stay ( Table 6). 16% of respondents with below-average incomes and 10% of respondents with average incomes would choose private accommodation where they would themselves be in charge of hygiene. Verified hotels would be chosen by 12% of respondents with below-average incomes, 30% of respondents with average incomes and 32% of respondents with above-average incomes.   Regarding the organisation of travel, before the outbreak of the pandemic, 63% of Generation Y and Generation Z respondents organised travel on their own, and 37% through a travel agency, while during the pandemic, 81% of those who travelled organised the travel on their own, and 19% through a travel agency. According to χ2-test (Value = 0.230 a , df = 1, p = 0.632 > 0.05), it was found that there is no statistically significant difference in the answers of respondents according to gender in relation to the travel organisation before the pandemic (Table 1), that is, the percentage of the male and female respondents who organised self-directed travel (male: 62%, female: 65%) and through travel agencies (male: 38%, female: 35%) is approximate. On the other hand, when observing those who travelled during the pandemic, it was found that there is a statistically significant difference in the responses according to gender in relation to the organisation of travel during the pandemic (χ2-test, Value = 6.839 a , df = 1, p = 0.009 < 0.05), i.e. there is a higher percentage of female respondents who organise self-directed travel (89%) in relation to the services of travel agencies, and in relation to male respondents (75%), (Table 4).  Table 2). The percentage of the members of Generation Z and Generation Y who organised travel both on their own (Z: 61%, Y: 66%) and through travel agencies (Z: 39%, Y: 34%) before the pandemic is approximate. When taking into account those who reported travel during the pandemic, there is a statistically significant difference in the respondents" responses according to their age group in relation to the organisation of travel during the pandemic (χ2-test, Value = 6.840 a , df = 1, p = 0.009 < 0.05), i.e. there is a higher percentage of Generation Z members who have organised self-directed travel (88%) compared to the services of travel agencies (12%), and in relation to me mbers of Generation Y who have organised travel on their own (75%), (Table 5). When considering the distribution of the respondents according to the amount of income in relation to the organisation of travel before the outbreak of the pandemic (Table 3), there is a statistically significant difference in the respondents" responses (χ2-test, Value = 11.661 a , df = 2, p = 0.003 < 0.05), i.e. 69% of respondents with an average income organised travel under their own direction in relation to the services of travel agencies (31%), and 46% of respondents with below average and above average incomes organised self-directed travel (and 54% through travel agencies), (Table 6). When observing the distribution of respondents according to the level of income in relation to travel organisation during the pandemic, there is a statistically significant difference in the answers of respondents (χ2-test, Value = 11.991a, df = 2, p = 0.002 < 0.05), that is, 87% of respondents with average incomes have organised self-directed travel during the pandemic (and 13% through travel agencies), as well as 85% of respondents with below-average incomes (and 15% through travel agencies) and 57% of respondents with above-average incomes (and 43% through travel agencies), (Table 6). Source: Author"s research As for the attitude of passengers regarding COVID-19 passports, 65% believe that they are not necessary for travel; 22% think that this type of passport is needed, and 13% are undecided on this issue. According to Table 4, there is a higher percentage of male respondents who consider it necessary to travel with a COVID-19 passport (37%) compared to female respondents (7%). There is a statistically significant difference in the answers of the respondents according to gender in relation to this question (χ2-test, Value = 42.222 a , df = 2, p = 0.00 < 0.05) ( Table 1). Also, there is a statistically significant difference in the answers of the respondents according to generations in relation to this question (χ2-test, Value = 8.495 a , df = 2, p = 0.0014 < 0.05) ( Table 2), i.e. members of Generation Z in a higher percentage consider that this type of passport is not necessary (72%) in relation to members of Generation Y (59%), (Table 5). It was also found that there is a statistically significant difference in the answers of the respondents according to the amount of income in relation to the same question (χ2-test, Value = 32.970 a , df = 4, p = 0.00 < 0.05) ( Table 3). 12% of respondents with a below-average income, 20% of respondents with an average income, and 64% of respondents with an above-average income believe that a COVID-19 passport is necessary for security reasons.

Conclusion
The COVID-19 pandemic is affecting everyone across the planet. The majority of people have adapted their lives to the pandemic and live their lives according to the proscribed "rules". Consumer behaviour in tourism has also changed. Businesses around the world have been adapting to the changing needs and expectations of Millennials and Generation Z in the light of COVID-19 (Euromonitor International, 2020). The pandemic has also affected the consumers psychologicallythey choose "safer" offers, opt for things that they can control to some extent, such as, for example, self-directed travel, where they will organise the whole travel and stay at a certain place and type of accommodation.
Based on the examined behaviour of consumers of tourist servicesthe members of Generation Y and Generation Z in Serbia, it can be concluded that they are less opting for the services of travel agencies in organising their travel, especially in the new conditions dictated by the COVID-19 pandemic. During the pandemic, the number of passengers who have organised travel under their own direction has increased (63% of respondents before the outbreak of the pandemic; 81% during the pandemic). Thus, the demand for travel arrangements through travel agencies has decreased during the pandemic. A larger percentage of the members of Generation Z and Millennials have decided to organise selfdirected travel in relation to the services of travel agencies, both before and during the pandemic. There is a higher percentage of Generation Z who have organised self-directed travel during the pandemic (88%) compared to Millennials (75%), and a higher percentage of Millennials who use travel agency services (25%) compared to Generation Z (12%). There is a higher percentage of female respondents who organise travel on their own (89%) compared to male respondents (75%). During the pandemic, the highest percentage of respondents with average income have organised self-directed travel (87%) compared to the below-average income earners (85%) and above-average income earners (57%). The percentage of the respondents with above-average income who use the services of a travel agency is higher (43%) compared to other categories with a lower income (below average: 15%; average amount of income: 13%). The results of the research show that there is a statistically significant difference in the respondents" responses according to gender, age group and the amount of income in relation to organisation of travel (under their own direction, through a travel agency) during the pandemic, while it is proven that there is no statistically significant difference in the respondents" responses by gender and age group in relation to travel organisation before the outbreak of the pandemic. There is only a statistically significant difference in the respondents" responses according to the amount of income before the pandemic. Hence, the research hypothesis H 1 is partially confirmed and hypothesis H 2 is fully confirmed.
As it has been determined that there is a statistically significant difference in the respondents" responses according to gender, age group and income in relation to the choice of accommodation (private accommodation where they would themselves be in charge of hygiene, verified hotels, any accommodation) while travelling during the pandemic, research hypothesis H 3 has been confirmed. There is a higher percentage of female respondents whose choice would be to book private accommodation where they would themselves be in charge of hygiene (19%) compared to male respondents (2%), while male respondents prefer verified hotels (38%) compared to female respondents (7%). Generation Z members would choose private accommodation for hygiene reasons in a smaller percentage (6%), as well as verified hotels (18%) compared to Millennials (private accommodation: 15%, hotels: 27%). Also, Generation Z points out that they do not care where they stay in a higher percentage (59%) compared to Generation Y (31%). The highest percentage of private accommodation would be chosen by respondents with incomes below average, and the verified hotels would be chosen by respondents with above-average incomes.
It is proven that there is a statistically significant difference in respondents" responses according to gender, age group and the amount of income in relation to the opinion about travel with the COVID-19 passport, and research hypothesis H 4 has been confirmed. There is a higher percentage of male respondents who consider it necessary to travel with a COVID-19 passport (37%) compared to female respondents (7%). A higher percentage of members of Generation Z consider that this type of passport is not necessary (72%) in relation to members of Generation Y (59%). 12% of respondents with a below-average income, 20% of respondents with an average income and 64% of respondents with an above-average income believe that COVID-19 passport is necessary for security reasons. 65% of these generations believe that this passport isn"t necessary for travel and 22% believe that it is needed.
The research hypothesis H5 is mostly confirmed as it has been determined that there is a statistically significant difference in the answers of Generation Z and Millennials as travellers in relation to the choice of accommodation facilities in the future, than in relation to organisation of travel during the pandemic, as well as in relation to the question regarding the opinion about travel with the COVID-19 passport. The results of the research show that there is no statistically significant difference in the responses of these generations in relation to the organisation of travel before the pandemic. During the pandemic, there is a higher percentage of Generation Z members who have organised self-directed travel (88%) in relation to members of Generation Y (75%). Also, members of Generation Z consider that the COVID-19 passport is not necessary for travel in a higher percentage (72%) compared to members of Generation Y (59%). A higher percentage of Generation Y has stated that they choose private accommodation for hygiene reasons (15%) and verified hotels (27%) compared to Generation Z (private accommodation: 6%, hotels: 18%).
The global travel industry had one of the strongest expansion cycles in its history prior to the pandemic. It is believed that the Millennials will offer the industry a lifeline during the recovery (Gasdia & Jackson, 2020). "With or without a crisis, Gen Z and Millennials are of special interest, given their increasing spending power in the coming years and their ability to influence older generations" (Bona et al., 2020).
Practical implication. Given that there is a decrease in opting for the services of travel agencies, especially during the pandemic, among Generation Z and Millennials in Serbia, tourism and hospitality organisations need to be creative in order to attract members of these generations. Managers of tourism and hospitality organisations should take care of the image of the destination taking into account health, safety and hygiene requirements. They need to use social media like YouTube, Twitter, TikTok, Instagram, and travel influencers to attract travellers. Upon the completion of travel, organisations need to continue maintaining contact with their customers through their social networks. Marketing managers should also keep in mind that, while Millennial travellers have money to spend, they still like to have a great deal. "Approximately 92% of Millennials report that they won"t finalize their booking until they feel they have the best deal possible" (Rezdy, 2018).
Limitations and recommendations for the future research. The paper provides mainly factual answers to the questions regarding the organisation of travel by Millennials and Generation Z, without taking into consideration the motives for certain consumer behaviours of tourists during the COVID-19 pandemic, which may be a direction of some future research as an upgrade of the presented analyses in this work. This research represents a case study, as the sample consists of an insufficient number of respondents for reliable representativeness, so research on the same topic can be repeated with a larger number of respondents in Serbia.